See what the Supreme Court just ruled on abortion laws.
The choice to leave this Texas law in place marks a shift from a conservative court that still tries to keep up the appearance of objectivity to a Supreme Court that is fully partisan. The message leaving the law in place sends to other state governments is clear: You can do what you want.
I’m not the only one who is worried about this. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts was horrified by the decision, saying that the “. The George W. Bush–appointed justice continued: “If the legislatures of the several states may, at will, annul the judgments of the courts of the United States and destroy the rights acquired under those judgments, the Constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery.” Roberts, who has been on the court since 2005, sees where this is going.
Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the same thing. “The Court clears the way for States to reprise and perfect Texas’s scheme in the future to target the exercise of any right recognized by this Court with which they disagree,” . “New permutations of S.B. 8 are coming.” Both justices are worried about the same thing: Allowing S.B.8 to stand gives states the permission to do whatever they want since it so clearly flies in the face of constitutional precedent.: “The worst part isn’t what the conservative majority is allowing Texas to do to the constitutional rights of women, although that is terrible.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Supreme Court refuses to block vaccine mandate for New York health care workersThe Supreme Court has declined to block the Covid-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers in New York after a challenge from some nurses and doctors in the state. NBC's Pete Williams has details.
Lire la suite »
U.S. Supreme Court rejects religious challenge to New York vaccine mandateThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected challenges brought by a group of Christian doctors and nurses and an organization that promotes vaccine skepticism to New York's refusal to allow religious exemptions to the state's mandate that healthcare workers be vaccinated against COVID-19.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court declines to block New York vaccine mandateJUST IN: The Supreme Court has turned away two emergency requests from health care workers, doctors and nurses in New York to block the state's vaccine mandate. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented.
Lire la suite »
The Supreme Court seems ready to poke a hole in the church-state wallAll parents have the right to pay to send their child to a religious school but why, Justice Kagan asked, “does the state …have to subsidise the exercise of a right?”
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court rejects move to block New York vaccine mandateThe U.S. Supreme Court has denied a request to block New York’s vaccination mandate for health care workers because it doesn't have a religious exemption
Lire la suite »
Anti-abortion Supreme Court justices risk slippery slope with ruling on Texas abortion lawRachel Maddow shares highlights from the dissenting opinions of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sonia Sotomayor who warned their anti-abortion colleagues that failing to put an end to the Texas abortion law invites 'nullifying federal rights' when other states follow the Texas law's model.
Lire la suite »