Passed by the Texas legislature last year, SB4 empowers state officials to arrest and jail migrants suspected of entering the U.S. illegally.
Hours after the Supreme Court gave Texas officials permission to jail and prosecute migrants suspected of crossing the U.S. southern border without authorization, an appeals court late Tuesday blocked the state from enforcing its controversial immigration law known as SB4.In a late-night order, a 5th Circuit Court of Appeals panel dissolved a pause that it issued in early March to suspend a lower court ruling that found SB4 to be unconstitutional.The order reinstated a ruling from U.S.
The high court allowed SB4 to take effect for several hours, though it's unclear whether Texas arrested any migrants under the law during that short time span.Ezra's order blocking SB4 will stay in place until the 5th Circuit rules on Texas' request to allow the law to be enforced while the appeals court considers its legality. A virtual hearing on that question is scheduled for Wednesday morning.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Supreme Court extends pause on Texas law that would allow state police to arrest migrantsThe Supreme Court has extended a pause on a Texas law that would allow state police to arrest migrants accused of crossing into the U.S. illegally.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court extends pause on Texas law that would allow state police to arrest migrantsThe court now has another week to make a decision about the Texas law that would allow state police to arrest migrants.
Lire la suite »
Texas lawmakers praise Supreme Court backing state law allowing arrest of illegal immigrants crossing borderTexas lawmakers reacted positively on Tuesday following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on a state illegal immigration law.
Lire la suite »
The Supreme Court will hear challenges to Texas and Florida social media lawsThese cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court justices appear skeptical of Texas and Florida social media lawsThese cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court hearing over 'bump stocks' ban and Texas Panhandle wildfire: Morning RundownElizabeth Robinson is a newsletter editor for NBC News, based in Los Angeles.
Lire la suite »