The report is far from conclusive, as it appears the investigators did not question the nine justices themselves.
, the investigators acknowledge that it wasn’t only employees who had access to sensitive documents, emphasis ours: “The investigators determined that, 82 employees had access to electronic or hard copies of the draft opinion.”All you need to do is sign up with your email and boom: credit for your preorder on a new Samsung device.Jezebel contacted the court’s public information office for comment on whether the Justices were questioned or not during the investigation.
Sarah Lipton-Lubet, president of Take Back the Court, called it a “sham investigation” in a statement. She wrote: “We should not lose sight of the irony of this probe: that the Court has lamented the violation of its own purported ‘right to privacy’ at the same time it dismantled this very same right for pregnant people across the country in order to rip away their access to abortion.
“At the same time, the question remains: were Justices Thomas and Alito, perhaps the most ethically dubious justices on the bench—who reportedly had extensive contact with outside anti-abortion forces prior to the Dobbs decision—interviewed? The report doesn’t say, and the Court must be asked. Given what we know about Alito and Thomas, if nobody talked to them directly, that seems like an admission by omission.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Washington state supreme court court OK's Albertsons' merger $4B dividendThe Washington state Supreme Court has brushed aside the final remaining legal hurdle in the way of a $4 billion dividend by Albertsons to its shareholders ahead of a proposed merger with grocery rival Kroger.
Lire la suite »
U.S. Supreme Court mulls Turkish lender Halkbank's bid to avoid chargesU.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday grappled with thorny questions of sovereign immunity as they weighed a bid by Turkey's state-owned lender Halkbank to avoid criminal charges in the United States for allegedly helping Iran evade American economic sanctions.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court considers case of transgender immigrant seeking relief from deportationThe Supreme Court on Tuesday heard arguments in the case of a Guatemalan transgender woman who is attempting to avoid deportation from the United States after a lower court said the immigrant failed to go through the proper procedures to demonstrate persecution in the country of origin.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court weighs criminal charges against Turkish bank over violations of Iranian sanctionsA Turkish bank accused of flouting U.S. sanctions against Iran argued Tuesday before the Supreme Court that it is shielded from American legal challenges because it is operated by a foreign sovereign.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court struggles with criminal charges against Turkish-owned bankThe Supreme Court considered whether the federal government can pursue criminal charges against Turkey’s state-owned bank, which is accused of helping to launder billions of dollars so Iran could evade U.S. economic sanctions.
Lire la suite »
Deaf student's lawsuit at center of Supreme Court caseThe Supreme Court is set to hear a case that could make it more difficult for students with disabilities to resolve problems quickly when they’re not getting needed assistance in public schools
Lire la suite »