The Supreme Court reversed a decision from lower court that found GOP lawmakers improperly used race when designing one of South Carolina's congressional districts.
Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday maintained the lines of a congressional district in South Carolina that a lower court had invalidated as an unlawful racial gerrymander, delivering a win to Republican mapmakers who said they used politics, not race, as the predominant factor when drawing the district bounds.
But the NAACP's South Carolina chapter and a voter in the district challenged the boundaries of Congressional District 1 as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander and alleged the district was designed with racially discriminatory intent.After an eight-day trial, the three-judge panel agreed and concluded that GOP lawmakers impermissibly used a racial target and sorted voters predominantly by race to achieve a partisan outcome.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Supreme Court finds no bias against Black voters in a South Carolina congressional districtThe Supreme Court has preserved a Republican-held South Carolina congressional district, rejecting a lower-court ruling the district discriminated against Black voters.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court upholds a South Carolina congressional district, finding no discrimination against Black votersSupreme Court upholds a South Carolina congressional district, finding no discrimination against Black voters
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court finds no bias against Black voters in a South Carolina congressional districtThe Supreme Court has preserved a Republican-held South Carolina congressional district, rejecting a lower-court ruling the district discriminated against Black voters
Lire la suite »
South Carolina's 'Carolina Squat' ban gets enforced May 10South Carolina will begin issuing tickets to motorists who drive a 'squatted' vehicle; the modification has been banned since November 2023.
Lire la suite »
Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, says court will grant Donald Trump some level of immunitySen. Lindsey Graham says he thinks the Supreme Court will send former President Donald Trump's election interference case back to the lower courts to decide which of his actions qualify for presidential immunity.
Lire la suite »
NY court upholds mandatory abortion coverage; Albany diocese plans Supreme Court appealALBANY, N.Y. (AP) New York can continue to require companies with health insurance plans to cover medically necessary abortions, the state's highest court rule
Lire la suite »