Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., writing for the majority, said courts should recognize the “weighty interest that a State has in protecting its own laws.”
The justices were not considering the merits of Kentucky’s law, which would mostly outlaw dilation-and-evacuation abortion after 13 weeks from the last menstrual period.
Instead, the debate is over which government official gets to decide that enough is enough now that the law has lost in federal district court and then before a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.The law was passed by the Kentucky legislature in 2018 and signed by then-Gov. Matt Bevin, a Republican.
Enter Republican Cameron, who had won the race to replace Beshear as attorney general. He attempted to intervene in the case and continue to defend the law. But the appeals court said it was too late, citing his predecessor Beshear’s decision to stay out of the case. In reversing the decision, Alito said courts should be more lenient in such cases. “Paramount” among a state’s powers “is the power to enact and enforce any laws that do not conflict with federal law,” Alito wrote, adding: “This means that a State’s opportunity to defend its laws in federal court should not be lightly cut off.”
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Republican senators must be smart with Supreme Court confirmationRepublicans take their responsibility to advise and consent seriously, but also accept that the president is entitled to put forward qualified candidates, writes JessicaWCurtis. 'My advice to Republicans is simple. Let’s be smart about this!'
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court lets Kentucky's GOP AG defend 15-week abortion banJUST IN: The Supreme Court says Kentucky's AG can bring back the defense of a law that would ban abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Justice Sonia Sotomayor was the only judge to dissent.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court deliberates whether to allow suit against Border Patrol agentThe Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in Egbert v. Boule, determining whether to allow a case to proceed against a Border Patrol agent accused of using excessive force during a search at an inn located south of the U.S.-Canada border.
Lire la suite »
Biden's past Supreme Court experience helped inform choicePresident Joe Biden knows better than anyone the unexpected turns a Supreme Court nomination can take after it lands on Capitol Hill.
Lire la suite »