Supreme Court rejects lawsuit that sought to hold Reddit responsible for hosting child pornography | CNN Politics

France Nouvelles Nouvelles

Supreme Court rejects lawsuit that sought to hold Reddit responsible for hosting child pornography | CNN Politics
France Dernières Nouvelles,France Actualités
  • 📰 CNN
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 16 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 95%

The Supreme Court declined to take up a case from a victim of sex trafficking who sought to hold Reddit responsible for hosting images of child pornography on the website

The dispute was the latest targeting a section of federal law that offers broad immunity to online platforms. Earlier this month, the court handed Google and Twitter a victory preserving their ability under the same law – Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act – to avoid lawsuits stemming from terrorist-related content.

Doe’s lawyer said in court papers that she was a minor when her then-boyfriend created multiple videos of the two of them engaging in sex, sometimes without her knowledge, and posted them online. She reported the content to Reddit and said it took days to remove the content but then allowed it to be reposted.

Nous avons résumé cette actualité afin que vous puissiez la lire rapidement. Si l'actualité vous intéresse, vous pouvez lire le texte intégral ici. Lire la suite:

CNN /  🏆 4. in US

France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités

Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.

Senate veterans: Supreme Court fight has roots in years of partisan combatSenate veterans: Supreme Court fight has roots in years of partisan combatSen. Sheldon Whitehouse tells Meet the Press, 'The work that we're doing on ethics in the court ought to be easy. And yet it's not. It's partisan also.' To address this, Whitehouse says, the justices themselves must start the reform process.
Lire la suite »

Sen. Whitehouse: Supreme Court Justices Are in a 'Fact-Free,' 'Ethics-Free Zone'Sen. Whitehouse: Supreme Court Justices Are in a 'Fact-Free,' 'Ethics-Free Zone'The senator compared right-wing billionaires influencing the court to the infamous barons who “captured” the railroad commissions to do their bidding
Lire la suite »

Gorsuch serves as conscience of the U.S. Supreme CourtGorsuch serves as conscience of the U.S. Supreme CourtThe United States Supreme Court last week tersely dismissed an immigration-related case, known as Arizona v. Mayorkas, because the matter was moot.
Lire la suite »

Supreme Court “Sackett” Decision Shrinks Protections for US WetlandsSupreme Court “Sackett” Decision Shrinks Protections for US WetlandsThis narrow interpretation of the Clean Water Act limits what qualifies as 'waters of the United States.'
Lire la suite »



Render Time: 2025-03-05 04:24:26