WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday left in place lawyer Michael Avenatti’s conviction for plotting to extort up to $25 million from Nike.
Avenatti's lawyers argued that the fraud statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutionally vague. They also contended that Avenatti cannot be criminally charged with plotting to extort money from Nike because he was engaged in settlement negotiations.rejected Avenatti’s claim
Warning: This story contains graphic details of alleged sexual assaults.The sexual assault trial of former Woodstock, Ont., mayor Trevor Birtch began Monday with testimony from a woman who said his behaviour suddenly turned from friendly and compassionate to angry and hostile on two occasions after she declined his request to perform oral sex on him. "He would just turn suddenly — it was like Jekyll and Hyde," said the woman, at times crying while testifying.
A "preliminary investigation indicates that one of the offenders fired at the homeowner, and the homeowner returned fire," said the Winnetka Police DepartmentTeacher testifies about being shot as attempted murder trial starts in Moncton
Stormy Daniels Nike Supreme Court President Donald Trump Federal Appeals Court Brett Kavanaugh Conviction
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
TRILLIUM TALK: Why the Ford government is fighting unions at the Supreme CourtEvery Sunday morning, one of our legislative reporters from The Trillium provides an inside look at the week that was in Ontario politics — and the week ahead
Lire la suite »
TRILLIUM TALK: Why the Ford government is fighting unions at the Supreme CourtEvery Sunday morning, one of our legislative reporters from The Trillium provides an inside look at the week that was in Ontario politics — and the week ahead
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court upholds sexual-assault conviction, affirms refusal of evidenceThe court split 7-2 in a case that raised questions about how to balance a complainant’s right to be protected from improper questioning against an accused person’s right to challenge a complainant’s credibility
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court upholds sexual assault conviction, affirms refusal of evidenceOTTAWA — A man found guilty of sexually assaulting his long-time partner was properly denied a chance to present evidence about sexual activity they engaged in shortly before the offence, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court upholds sexual assault conviction, affirms refusal of evidenceOTTAWA — A man found guilty of sexually assaulting his long-time partner was properly denied a chance to present evidence about sexual activity they engaged in shortly before the offence, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court upholds sexual assault conviction, affirms refusal of evidenceOTTAWA — A man found guilty of sexually assaulting his long-time partner was properly denied a chance to present evidence about sexual activity they engaged in shortly before the offence, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled.
Lire la suite »