BREAKING: Supreme Court delivers win for Native American families in adoption case. The ruling says the law that gives preference to Native Americans in the adoption process does not discriminate on the basis of race, as challengers argued.
Chad and Jennifer Brackeen with their two biological children and Zachary, center, a Native American boy at the center of a court battle, at home near Fort Worth, Texas, in 2019.WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a challenge to a federal law aimed at protecting Native American children while buttressing tribal identity.
The ruling will come as a major relief to tribes, who were concerned that the court would weaken or entirely strike down a law that plays an important role in bolstering tribal identity The challengers are led by Chad and Jennifer Brackeen — a white evangelical Christian couple who sought to adopt a Native American boy — as well as the states of Texas, Indiana and Louisiana. The couple adopted the child after a potential placement with a Navajo family fell through. They are also seeking to adopt the child’s half-sister, who lives with them.
The law was defended by the Biden administration and five tribes: the Navajo, Cherokee, Oneida and Quinault Indian nations and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Students dig to learn about ancient Native American village in ProvoAfter almost a month of digging and excavating, local anthropology college students are wrapping up their archaeological dig of a Native American village that existed in Provo long ago.
Lire la suite »
Where Texas redistricting lawsuits stand after U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Alabama caseThe high court left intact a key provision of the federal Voting Rights Act in a case many feared would go the other way. The decision’s importance in ongoing litigation over Texas’ political maps will largely be felt in what didn’t happen.
Lire la suite »
Federal judges to discuss Alabama’s congressional map after Supreme Court rulingThe three-judge panel of judges overseeing a lawsuit over Alabama’s congressional map have scheduled a status conference for Friday, after the U.S. Supreme Court sided with their initial ruling that the maps may violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court: Ohio ballot board must fix language describing August supermajority questionThe Ohio Supreme Court on Monday ordered a state panel back to work to fix language describing an August ballot proposal aimed at making it harder to amend the state’s constitution, after justices determined elements of the wording would mislead voters.
Lire la suite »
Utah Supreme Court rules former USU football player's rape convictions will standTorrey Green will remain in prison for five rape convictions and other sexual misconduct charges after the Utah Supreme Court denied his appeal on June 1.
Lire la suite »
Letters to the Editor — Fairfield Lake State Park, baseball, Supreme Court, RepublicansRe: “Basking in baseball’s spirituality — Love of the game began with a transistor radio late at night,” by Robert Darden, Saturday Opinion. Darden’s column...
Lire la suite »