The Supreme Court said it had removed from its calendar a case relating to the pandemic-era immigration policy known as Title 42, which allows migrants to be quickly expelled at the southern border without an opportunity to request asylum
the U.S.-Mexico border rose sharply, Mexico placed sharp limits on whom it would accept back under the Title 42 provisions. Since then, migrants from South America and the Caribbean, most of whom Mexico won’t allow back in, started crossing the border in greater numbers.
For the past few months, roughly 30% of migrants crossing the border were expelled using the pandemic-era tool. The rest were processed under normal immigration laws—meaning they were detained or, more often, released into the U.S. to seek asylum. The administration announced Title 42 will formally end on May 11, the same day the Covid-19 public-health emergency is set to end.
Republican-led states have fought for a year in court to keep Title 42 in place, successfully thwarting several attempts by the Biden administration to end its use.
The administration said in a recent legal briefing it plans to have that new policy in place by May 11, a process that could open the administration to fresh legal challenges brought by immigrant advocates.Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Supreme Court cancels arguments in Title 42 case with border policy set to end in MayThe Supreme Court on Thursday canceled arguments it had scheduled over a pandemic-era policy known as Title 42, after the Biden administration said the case would be rendered moot once the border restrictions expire in early May.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court asked to decide if climate change lawsuits are federal or state court territoryWhen local governments sue oil companies over contributing to climate change, which courts have jurisdiction — federal or state?
Lire la suite »
Balenciaga designer talks 'mistake,' insists child porn Supreme Court case in photo was 'coincidence'Balenciaga designer Demna, the creative director behind the controversial ad that features young children and props that many claimed were related to 'BDSM,' apologized again in a new interview.
Lire la suite »
Wisconsin state Supreme Court election could prove decisive in 2024A little known, off-year election in Wisconsin could determine the crucial swing state's Electoral College votes in 2024, according to local experts.
Lire la suite »
Anti-abortion group commits $100,000 to Wisconsin Supreme Court raceA major anti-abortion group is committing at least $100,000 to back a conservative judge running in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race that will determine the ideological balance of the court, which would shape rulings regarding abortion in the state.
Lire la suite »