Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toy

France Nouvelles Nouvelles

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toy
France Dernières Nouvelles,France Actualités
  • 📰 ABC7Chicago
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 22 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 63%

'This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,' Kagan wrote in an opinion for the court.

The Supreme Court on Thursday gave whiskey maker Jack Daniel's reason to raise a glass, handing the company a new chance to win a trademark dispute with the makers of the Bad Spaniels dog toy.

"This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence," Kagan wrote in an opinion for the court. At another point, Kagan asked readers to "Recall what the bottle looks like " before inserting a color picture of it. The packaging of the toy, which retails for around $20, notes in small font: "This product is not affiliated with Jack Daniel Distillery."

Nous avons résumé cette actualité afin que vous puissiez la lire rapidement. Si l'actualité vous intéresse, vous pouvez lire le texte intégral ici. Lire la suite:

ABC7Chicago /  🏆 284. in US

France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités

Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.

Ruff day in court for Arizona doggy toy makerRuff day in court for Arizona doggy toy makerA squeaky dog toy by Arizona-based VIP Products infringes on the Jack Daniels trademark, the U.S. Supreme Court said in a ruling Thursday.
Lire la suite »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyThe Supreme Court is giving whiskey maker Jack Daniel’s a reason to raise a glass
Lire la suite »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyJack Daniel’s, based in Lynchburg, Tennessee, wasn't amused. Its lawyers argued that the toy misleads customers, profits “from Jack Daniel’s hard-earned goodwill” and associates its “whiskey with excrement.
Lire la suite »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toy“This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,” Justice Kagan wrote in an opinion for the court.
Lire la suite »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toy'This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,' Kagan wrote in an opinion for the court.
Lire la suite »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyThe Supreme Court on Thursday gave whiskey maker Jack Daniel's reason to raise a glass, handing the company a new chance to win a trademark dispute with the makers of the Bad Spaniels dog toy.
Lire la suite »



Render Time: 2025-03-04 21:19:21