Leftist Americans talk of defending democracy, but for those on the right, liberalism stands for elite power, anti-democratic forms of government, the bureaucracy and the juristocracy, writes New York Times columnist Ross Douthat.
An American flag is flown at a rally at the Valdosta Regional Airport in Valdosta, Ga., Dec. 5, 2020. “That conservatism and the Republican Party have turned against government by the people, that only the Democratic Party still stands for democratic rule, is an important organizing thought of political commentary these days,” writes New York Times columnist Ross Douthat.
First, there’s a sense in which conservatism has always had a fraught relationship to mass democracy. The fear of mob rule, of demagogues rallying the masses to destroy a fragile social order, is a common theme in many right-wing schools of thought, showing up among traditionalist defenders of aristocracy and libertarians alike.
Republicans have long feared voter fraud and noncitizen voting, for instance, but the fear — and for liberals, the oft-discussed hope — that demographic change could deliver permanent Democratic power have raised the salience of these anxieties. Likewise, Republicans have long been more likely to portray America as a republic, not a democracy, and to defend our system’s countermajoritarian mechanisms.
And that idea and self-image has remained a potent aspect of the right-wing imagination even as the old Nixon and Reagan majorities have diminished and disappeared: With every new age of grassroots activism, from the Tea Party to the local-education revolts of today, the right reliably casts itself as small-d democrats, standing boldly athwart liberal technocracy singing “Yankee Doodle.”
But if that argument is challenging to make amid the smog of Trumpenkampf, so is the anti-Trump argument that casts American liberalism as the force to which anyone who believes in American democracy must rally. Because however much the right’s populists get wrong about their claim to represent a true American majority, they get this much right: Contemporary liberalism is fundamentally miscast as a defender of popular self-rule.
This vision — what my colleague Nate Cohn recently called “undemocratic liberalism” — is a pervasive aspect of establishment politics not only in the United States but across the Western world. On question after controverted question, its answer to “Who votes?” is different from its answer to “Who decides?” In one case, the people; in the other, the credentialed experts, the high-level stakeholders and activist groups, the bureaucratic process.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
No, Democrats and Republicans Aren’t Equally Anti-DemocraticThe Democratic Party's chief problem isn’t its inadequate enthusiasm for popular democracy as much as our constitutional framework’s myriad obstacles to the same. EricLevitz writes
Lire la suite »
Julia Fox Talks Drake Romance Rumors and Says They Didn't 'Really' DateKanye West's GF Julia Fox is addressing reports that she once dated Drake ... she says 'nothing really happened' ... the question, what does 'really' mean?
Lire la suite »
How To Break Up With A Friend–And How I Fell ShortI really thought I was going the right route, but turns out I biffed it up royally. Learn from my mistakes.
Lire la suite »
Chrome is changing its logo for the first time in eight yearsIf you squint really hard, you can see the difference.
Lire la suite »