But Reagan's speechwriter Peggy Noonan concluded also wrote that a 'full-blown' trial on impeachment charges 'with an election in less than a year, will seem absurd to all but diehards and do the country no good.'
Noonan began by stating,"Look, the case has been made," and that nearly everything in this week's impeachment hearings"fleshed out and backed up" allegations that Trump requested Ukraine's president to investigate 2020 Democratic candidate Joe Biden for his own political gain.
Noonan criticized Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman's testimony on Tuesday, said U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordan Sondland's testimony on Wednesday was"enormously effective in doing Mr. Trump damage," and said that former White House Russia expert Fiona Hill on Thursday spoke"truer words" when she told Sondland"this is all going to blow up."
"A full-blown trial on charges most everyone will believe are true, and with an election in less than a year, will seem absurd to all but diehards and do the country no good," Noonan wrote."So the reasonable guess is Republican senators will call to let the people decide. In a divided country this is the right call."
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Hill puts the nail in the Democrats' caseFiona Hill, the last witness in two weeks of televised impeachment hearings, made the case against her old boss President Donald Trump better than Democrats ever have.
Lire la suite »
Pelosi says Trump's Ukraine scandal compromised national securitySpeaker Pelosi said it's clear that President Trump compromised national security by leveraging his presidency for personal gain, but wouldn’t say if Dems had enough evidence to impeach him
Lire la suite »
Under Donald Trump, 'extortion and corruption are probably...the norm,' says former Bush speechwriterThe president is facing impeachment amid accusations that he tried to pressure Ukraine into interfering in the 2020 election to his advantage.
Lire la suite »
Opinion | The circumstantial impeachment case against Trump (and why it's enough)The law doesn’t distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence. Both are admissible and can be used to prove wrongdoing.
Lire la suite »
Fox News judge dismisses Trump's 'I want nothing' defense: 'Clear understanding president wanted some things from the Ukrainians'While Trump seemed confident after Wednesday's impeachment hearings, Judge Andrew Napolitano said the Democrats still have a case.
Lire la suite »
News Analysis: After Trump impeachment hearings, both sides scrambleAfter days of damaging testimony in the Trump impeachment hearings, Democrats claimed they had built an airtight case against the president. Will it matter?
Lire la suite »