A Kentucky print shop owner who refused to make a gay pride T-shirt argued before the Kentucky Supreme Court that he shouldn't be compelled to promote messages that go against his religious beliefs.
Aug. 23, 2019, 7:03 PM UTCFRANKFORT, Ky. — A Kentucky print shop owner who refused to make a gay pride T-shirt argued before the Kentucky Supreme Court that he shouldn't be compelled to promote messages that go against his religious beliefs.
Blaine Adamson is owner of Hands-On Originals in Lexington and declined to print a shirt promoting an LGBT pride festival in 2012. The city's Human Rights Commission said that refusal violated its gay-rights fairness ordinance. On Friday, the high court heard an attorney for the T-shirt maker argue that the First Amendment protects him from having to print that message. An attorney for the Human Rights Commission says the T-shirt maker cannot pick and choose who it wants to serve in the Lexington community.Follow
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
South Korea's top court to rule on Samsung heir's bribery case on August 29: YTNSouth Korea's Supreme Court will deliver a ruling on the bribery conviction...
Lire la suite »
U.S. Justice Ginsburg treated for pancreatic cancerLiberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has completed a three-wee...
Lire la suite »
Kendall Jenner Went Out in a T-Shirt and No Pants or Makeup Because It's SummerSave the effort for fall.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg undergoes cancer treatment for pancreatic tumorSupreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has completed a three-week course of radiation therapy for cancer, the top court said in a statement Friday.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg treated for pancreatic cancerBREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was recently treated for a 'localized malignant tumor' on her pancreas, the court says. 'The tumor was treated definitively and there is no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body.'
Lire la suite »