New Jersey fishermen's Supreme Court fight against government monitors could have ripple effect

France Nouvelles Nouvelles

New Jersey fishermen's Supreme Court fight against government monitors could have ripple effect
France Dernières Nouvelles,France Actualités
  • 📰 6abc
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 49 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 63%

A ruling in favor of the fisherman could completely change the way the federal government operates, one expert says.

For nearly 50 years, America's herring fishermen have been required to take federal monitors on their boats when they set out into the North Atlantic.But now there's a catch.

This fall, Axelsson, Bright and half a dozen other fishermen -- who say the added expense could drive some out of business -- will take their crusade against the policy to the U.S. Supreme Court."This case is going to completely change the way the federal government operates if the Supreme Court decides to change the status quo," said Meredith Moore, director of the fish conservation program at Ocean Conservancy and member of the nation's Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee.

"This is about gray areas, but the problem is, once you say that there are gray areas and then there's a different rule, people start seeing gray everywhere," Clement said. "If the agency really wants this authority, they should go back to Congress and get it." "What we could lose with this case is the grounding of our government in expertise and science in the way that we interpret laws all over the country," said Moore.

Nous avons résumé cette actualité afin que vous puissiez la lire rapidement. Si l'actualité vous intéresse, vous pouvez lire le texte intégral ici. Lire la suite:

6abc /  🏆 250. in US

France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités

Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.

New Jersey Supreme Court to rule on pandemic-related insurance exclusionsNew Jersey Supreme Court to rule on pandemic-related insurance exclusionsNew Jersey’s Supreme Court is expected to consider whether an Atlantic City casino can get payouts from business interruption insurance for losses during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Lire la suite »

New Jersey Supreme Court to rule on pandemic-related insurance exclusionsNew Jersey Supreme Court to rule on pandemic-related insurance exclusionsNew Jersey’s Supreme Court is expected to consider whether an Atlantic City casino can get payouts from business interruption insurance for losses during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Lire la suite »

New Jersey Supreme Court to rule on pandemic-related insurance exclusionsNew Jersey Supreme Court to rule on pandemic-related insurance exclusionsNew Jersey’s Supreme Court is expected to consider whether an Atlantic City casino can get payouts from business interruption insurance for losses during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Lire la suite »

New Jersey Supreme Court to rule on pandemic-related insurance exclusionsNew Jersey’s Supreme Court is expected to consider whether an Atlantic City casino can...
Lire la suite »

Whistleblowers Ask the Texas Supreme Court To Return Their Case To Trial CourtWhistleblowers Ask the Texas Supreme Court To Return Their Case To Trial CourtFour whistleblowers, former top deputies of the Texas Attorney General’s Office who reported Attorney General Ken Paxton to federal authorities, continued their legal fight on Monday despite Paxton prevailing in the impeachment proceedings against him. In a Monday filing to the Texas Supreme Court, Blake Brickman, Ryan Vassar, Mark Penley...
Lire la suite »

Michigan Supreme Court orders all judges to use people’s preferred pronouns in courtMichigan Supreme Court orders all judges to use people’s preferred pronouns in courtThe Michigan Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered all judges to address people in court by the pronouns they use or by “other respectful means.”
Lire la suite »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 08:35:24