The NCAA said it will ask the Supreme Court to take up a case in which a district judge and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have ruled that the NCAA cannot have association-wide limits on education-related benefits that college athletes can receive.
The NCAA on Monday said it will ask the Supreme Court to take up a case in which a district judge and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have ruled that thethat college athletes can receive.
The case was brought on behalf of plaintiffs led by former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston. Among the items Wilken said those athletes may receive were scholarships to complete undergraduate or graduate degrees at any school. The judge also appeared to open the possibility of athletes being able to receive cash or cash-equivalent awards based on academics or graduation, albeit under some constraints.
“Instead, they … face an unending string of litigation that will not only transfer substantial control over intercollegiate athletics away from those with experience and expertise in the field, but also reduce the funds available to provide opportunities and services to student-athletes.”
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
States can force Electoral College voters to abide by popular vote, Supreme Court saysStates can require Electoral College voters to back the victor of their state's popular vote, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday, in a major dispute that could have an impact on November's presidential contest.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court rules 'faithless electors' can't go rogue at Electoral CollegeThe decision is a win for election officials who warned of chaos if presidential electors could go against the will of voters in their states.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court rules electoral college representatives must honor choice of state's votersJustices reject claim that electoral college members have a constitutional right to defy state's popular vote and cast a ballot for candidate of their choice.
Lire la suite »
Robocall ban upheld, broadened by Supreme Court in free-speech caseThe U.S. Supreme Court broadened the federal ban on robocalls to mobile phones, eliminating an exception that had existed for government-debt collection while leaving the rest of the law intact.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court rules 'faithless electors' can't go rogue at Electoral College.PeteWilliamsNBC: “The majority opinion said when the Constitution gave the authority to appoint electors the power of appointment includes the power to set conditions. And one of those conditions is that they will vote as the state does.”
Lire la suite »
In unanimous decision, Supreme Court rules 'faithless electors' not able to vote as they wishIn a win for election officials and supporters of the Electoral College, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that 'faithless electors' must vote the will of the voters and as their states direct.
Lire la suite »