A South Elgin letter to the editor: The Second Amendment is one sentence with two phrases and only one meaning. It starts 'A well-regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state.' The intent is a civilian controlled military-style force.
The Second Amendment is one sentence with two phrases and only one meaning. It starts"A well-regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state." The intent is a civilian controlled military-style force.
Militias in 18th century America were civilian paramilitary organizations created and regulated locally, but state chartered. Volunteers had to attend training sessions and supply a musket or rifle. The weapon was their personal property. Defense was to be accomplished by personally armed militia members who could be quickly mobilized into a army.
The amendment is about defense of he Constitution and the country, not firearm ownership. The framers took for granted most households had firearms. In many aspects the Second is obsolete in today's world. Our security depends on standing federal armed forces not locally controlled militias. The Amendment does not prohibit ownership or regulation of firearms. Federal Law should ban automatic weapons and weapon with little use. Regulation should be a State reasonability via uniform gun law passed by each State. This will create uniform base while
allowing each State to make modifications applicable to is own needs. Federal firearm laws do not work as they are one size fit all and each State ha different requirements and customs.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Letter: What amendments offerAn Arlington Heights letter to the editor: Mr. Bertz is right in his letter calling for making all guns illegal! Let's eliminate the Second Amendment. And while we're at it let's get rid of the First Amendment, too.
Lire la suite »
Fox: Dominion defamation suit is assault on First AmendmentA $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems over the network’s coverage of the 2020 presidential election is an assault on the First Amendment, attorneys for the cable news giant argued in a counterclaim unsealed Thursday.
Lire la suite »
Fox argues Dominion defamation suit is assault on First AmendmentA $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems over the network’s coverage of the 2020 presidential election is an assault on...
Lire la suite »
Fox: Dominion defamation suit is assault on First AmendmentWILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — A $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems over the network’s coverage of the 2020 presidential election is an assault on the First Amendment, attorneys for the cable news giant argued in a counterclaim unsealed Thursday.
Lire la suite »
Will a balanced budget amendment go anywhere in Congress?As the United States appears on track to add $19 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, Republican senators from Utah and Iowa reintroduced a balanced budget amendment Thursday.
Lire la suite »
TheOsceola - Gov. DeSantis signs Florida's NIL amendment
Lire la suite »