Justices Alito and Thomas Actually Brought Up a Dormant Abortion Ban During Supreme Court Hearing

France Nouvelles Nouvelles

Justices Alito and Thomas Actually Brought Up a Dormant Abortion Ban During Supreme Court Hearing
France Dernières Nouvelles,France Actualités
  • 📰 Jezebel
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 29 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 15%
  • Publisher: 63%

Since 2007, Jezebel has been the Internet's most treasured source for everything celebrities, sex, and politics...with teeth.

During a hearing about the abortion pill mifepristone, the two far-right jurists sounded like they believe the Comstock Act of 1873 can be enforced right now.on the lawsuit and how we got here.

Alito and Thomas invoking Comstock is a terrifying development, and the only small silver lining is that their questions make it crystal clear that Democrats Hawley responded to Thomas: “We don’t think that there’s any case of this court that empowers FDA to ignore other federal law. With respect to the Comstock Act as relevant here, the Comstock Act says that drugs should not be mailed, either through the mail or through common carriers , so we think that the plain text of that is pretty clear.Heads up: This is the strategy. They don't need to win Congress.

Nous avons résumé cette actualité afin que vous puissiez la lire rapidement. Si l'actualité vous intéresse, vous pouvez lire le texte intégral ici. Lire la suite:

Jezebel /  🏆 153. in US

France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités

Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.

Supreme Court justices cautious about limiting government's communication with social media companiesSupreme Court justices cautious about limiting government's communication with social media companiesDuring oral arguments on Monday, both liberal and conservative justices on the Supreme Court appeared wary of imposing broad limits on how the government can communicate with social media companies about problematic content it thinks should be removed. The case at issue is called Murthy v. Missouri, and it asks the court to determine whether the Biden administration’s communications with platforms coerced the companies to take down content, like misinformation about covid vaccines, thereby violating the First Amendment.
Lire la suite »

Two Supreme Court justices are reminding us how to act like adultsTwo Supreme Court justices are reminding us how to act like adultsIn our polarized society, there is an urgent need for civil debate. We are glad two U.S. Supreme Court justices and ideological opposites, Amy Coney Barrett...
Lire la suite »

Sen. Eric Schmitt dismisses concerns over skeptical justices in censorship Supreme Court caseSen. Eric Schmitt dismisses concerns over skeptical justices in censorship Supreme Court caseSen. Eric Schmitt isn't dismayed by seemingly skeptical questions from Supreme Court justices during oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri on Monday over the federal government's ability to direct and coordinate with social media companies.
Lire la suite »

Justices skeptical of broad limits on how the government speaks to platformsJustices skeptical of broad limits on how the government speaks to platformsLiberal and conservative justices alike seemed wary of conservative states’ arguments against the Biden administration in arguments over Murthy v. Missouri.
Lire la suite »

Supreme Court Liberal Justices Silent on Drag Show BanSupreme Court Liberal Justices Silent on Drag Show BanThe president of West Texas A&M University has successfully blocked drag shows on campus.
Lire la suite »

Justices hear arguments on Texas SB 4 immigration lawJustices hear arguments on Texas SB 4 immigration lawThe Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments about whether to allow back into effect a law allowing state and local authorities to deport migrants.
Lire la suite »



Render Time: 2025-02-25 10:05:55