Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis - Systematic Reviews

France Nouvelles Nouvelles

Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis - Systematic Reviews
France Dernières Nouvelles,France Actualités
  • 📰 BioMedCentral
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 47 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 71%

Prevalence of Rhett Syndrome, globally, has stayed stable for 20 years, which may facilitate planning of therapeutic trials in this disease, finds a Systematic Review published in Systematic Reviews.

], though the Orphanet estimate is limited by lack of a published description of its methods and data sources.

No studies that included patients with RTT older than 35 years were included. Studies report that, after reaching 25 years of age, adults with RTT have a mortality rate similar to the general population []. If that is indeed the case, the pooled prevalence estimates presented could be extrapolated to the general population. However, future studies should include patients of all ages to determine if the prevalence changes with age.

The strengths of this study were that the results encompassed the prevalence estimates from several nations and covered many different patient populations. Similar estimates were obtained for many different populations, and the true prevalence of RTT did not vary substantially from one region to another. To supplement the clinical criteria, some studies also used theInternational Classification of Disease, Tenth RevisionThe present meta-analysis has several limitations.

Nous avons résumé cette actualité afin que vous puissiez la lire rapidement. Si l'actualité vous intéresse, vous pouvez lire le texte intégral ici. Lire la suite:

BioMedCentral /  🏆 22. in UK

France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités

Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of antidepressants for pain in adults: overview of systematic reviewsEfficacy, safety, and tolerability of antidepressants for pain in adults: overview of systematic reviewsObjective To provide a comprehensive overview of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of antidepressants for pain according to condition. Design Overview of systematic reviews. Data sources PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 20 June 2022. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Systematic reviews comparing any antidepressant with placebo for any pain condition in adults. Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data. The main outcome measure was pain; for headache disorders it was frequency of headaches. Continuous pain outcomes were converted into a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain) and were presented as mean differences (95% confidence intervals). Dichotomous outcomes were presented as risk ratios (95% confidence intervals). Data were extracted from the time point closest to the end of treatment. When end of treatment was too variable across trials in a review, data were extracted from the outcome or time point with the largest number of trials and participants. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability (withdrawals because of adverse events). Findings were classified from each comparison as efficacious, not efficacious, or inconclusive. Certainty of evidence was assessed with the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation framework. Results 26 reviews (156 unique trials and |25 000 participants) were included. These reviews reported on the efficacy of eight antidepressant classes covering 22 pain conditions (42 distinct comparisons). No review provided high certainty evidence on the efficacy of antidepressants for pain for any condition. 11 comparisons (nine conditions) were found where antidepressants were efficacious, four with moderate certainty evidence: serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for back pain (mean difference −5.3, 95% confidence interval −7.3 to −3.3), postoperative pain (−7.3, −12.9 to −1.7), neurop
Lire la suite »

Cinnamon and cognitive function: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studiesCinnamon and cognitive function: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studiesCinnamon is the inner bark of trees named Cinnamomum. Studies have shown that cinnamon and its bioactive compounds can influence brain function and affect behavioral characteristics. This study aim...
Lire la suite »

This slimline robot vacuum is nearly 80% cheaper than Dyson - see incredible reviewsThis slimline robot vacuum is nearly 80% cheaper than Dyson - see incredible reviewsThe slimline cleaning gadget the Eufy RoboVac 30C Robot Vacuum Cleaner is currently just £169.99 at Amazon. It has 5 thousand 5 star reviews
Lire la suite »

The world lacks an effective global system to deal with debt\n\t\t\tLet our global subject matter experts broaden your perspective with timely insights and opinions you\n\t\t\tcan’t find anywhere else.\n\t\t
Lire la suite »

Facebook: Quarter of global population used site daily in DecemberFacebook: Quarter of global population used site daily in DecemberThe firm's shares surge, as boss Mark Zuckerberg declares 2023 a 'year of efficiency'.
Lire la suite »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 14:57:48