CRA wins one, loses one as government pursues pandemic benefits it deems questionable — via financialpost
CRB benefits are most commonly selected for review when it’s unclear that the taxpayer earned at least $5,000 of income in a prior qualifying period. Each of the two recent cases involved taxpayers asked to prove they earned enough income.
The second-level CRA officer reviewed the taxpayer’s prior returns, along with a bank statement for June 2020 in which the taxpayer redacted the account number, account holder’s name and transaction description prior to submitting it to the CRA. The cheque for $5,085 payable to the taxpayer was also submitted, but the branch and financial information numbers were redacted by the taxpayer.as both his 2019 and 2020 net commission income, as per his tax documents, were negative.
The judge also considered the cheque that redacted the taxpayer’s account number and the heavily redacted bank statement that omitted the taxpayer’s name, account number and essentially all other information other than enough to show a “mobile deposit” was made on June 2, 2020, in the amount of $5,085.Article content
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Health Canada doesn't discount COVID-19 lab leak theory: ReportHealth Canada is not discounting the theory that COVID\u002D19 emerged from a laboratory in China.
Lire la suite »
Health Canada doesn't discount COVID-19 lab leak theory: ReportHealth Canada is not discounting the theory that COVID\u002D19 emerged from a laboratory in China.
Lire la suite »
Health Canada doesn't discount COVID-19 lab leak theory: reportHealth Canada is not discounting the theory that COVID\u002D19 emerged from a laboratory in China.
Lire la suite »
CRA wins one, loses one as government pursues pandemic benefits it deems questionableTwo COVID\u002D19 benefit cases give us a glimpse into the types of claims that are being reviewed by CRA and, consequently, denied. Read on.
Lire la suite »
CRA wins one, loses one as government pursues pandemic benefits it deems questionableTwo COVID\u002D19 benefit cases give us a glimpse into the types of claims that are being reviewed by CRA and, consequently, denied. Read on.
Lire la suite »
CRA wins one, loses one as government pursues pandemic benefits it deems questionableTwo COVID\u002D19 benefit cases give us a glimpse into the types of claims that are being reviewed by CRA and, consequently, denied. Read on.
Lire la suite »