The Supreme Court appeared headed for one of its most controversial terms in years only a month ago, but now it faces one of its lightest in recent memory
As the presidential election looms, the justices are on the path of deciding fewer cases and deferring some heated and politically charged questions as the federal government’s executive and legislative branches confront the coronavirus pandemic.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Providers Ask Supreme Court to Ease Texas Abortion Ban During Coronavirus EmergencyAbortion providers on Saturday asked the Supreme Court to relax a Texas executive order that bans nearly all abortions during the public-health crisis created by the new coronavirus.
Lire la suite »
Texas clinics ask Supreme Court to allow certain abortions during coronavirus pandemicThe clinics filed an emergency motion asking the justices to overturn a lower-court order and allow abortions when they can be performed using medication.
Lire la suite »
Coronavirus updates: Kansas Supreme Court strikes down measure allowing in-person Easter church servicesMany countries around the world and cities in the U.S. are pointing toward positive signs that social distancing might be finally flattening the curve.
Lire la suite »
Abortion providers ask Supreme Court to ease pandemic-related banAbortions rights advocates asked the Supreme Court on Saturday night to overturn part of the Texas governor’s sweeping ban on abortions during the coronavirus pandemic
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court asked to block Texas abortion banTexas officials temporarily banned abortion, citing the coronavirus pandemic. Abortion providers there have taken the fight to the Supreme Court.
Lire la suite »
The 115-year-old Supreme Court opinion that could determine rights during a pandemicWhen a US appeals court ruled this week that Texas could prevent physicians from performing abortions because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the judges leaned heavily on a 1905 Supreme Court decision against a Massachusetts man who had refused vaccination during a smallpox outbreak.
Lire la suite »