Is John Roberts’ new stance on voting rights actually institutionalist performance art?
These links will only work if you're on the device you listen to podcasts on. We do not support Stitcher at this time.We are showing you options for a computer but if you're on a phone or tablet.
These links will only work if you're on the device you listen to podcasts on. We do not support Stitcher at this time.We are showing you options for a computer but if you're on a phone or tabletFrance Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh Really Did Just Save the Voting Rights ActThe 5–4 decision is a huge victory for multi-racial democracy that sends a scathing message to red state lawmakers.
Lire la suite »
John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh Just Delivered the Surprise of the Supreme Court TermThe Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision on Thursday found that Alabama’s congressional map violates the Voting Rights Act’s ban on racial dilution. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the liberal justices in the majority. From mjs_DC:
Lire la suite »
Why John Roberts Reversed Himself This Time on Voting RightsThere is a story we’ve been telling about Chief Justice John Roberts. It's wrong.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court rules against Alabama in high-stakes Voting Rights Act caseChief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, finding Alabama's redistricting plan likely violated a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court rules in favor of Black Alabama voters in unexpected defense of Voting Rights ActChief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined with the court’s liberals in affirming a lower-court ruling that found a likely violation in an Alabama congressional map.
Lire la suite »