The court will determine whether noise from future residents should be considered “pollution” under CEQA as the University moves forward with its long-range plan.
A drone view of People’s Park in Berkeley, Calif., on Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024. UC Berkeley has surrounded the park with shipping containers and hired full-time security to keep people out while waiting for court approval to build student housing there.
Last year, an appellate court sided with the activists 3-0. Fearing the decision would indefinitely delay its master plan, including any future student housing, UC Berkeley appealed to the state Supreme Court to overturn that decision., amending the California Environmental Quality Act to clarify that noise generated by a housing project’s occupants can’t be considered a significant impact on the environment.
The attorney for the People’s Park activists, Thomas Lippe, argued that, while AB 1037 may have rendered moot their argument around social noise regarding the People’s Park project, such noise should still be taken into account by environmental reviews of the university’s more broad long-range plan, which includes both residential and non-residential components.
“Having CEQA require social noise analysis of the long-range plan simply doesn’t interfere with the actual decisions to construct housing,” Lippe said.
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
California Supreme Court to hear People's Park caseThe California Supreme Court will hear arguments over the historic People's Park, and whether UC Berkeley can legally build housing there.
Lire la suite »
People’s Park: California Supreme Court schedules arguments on controversial UC Berkeley development next monthUC Berkeley’s proposal for that land includes 1,100 university students and 125 homeless residents within two 12- and six-story dorm buildings.
Lire la suite »
What the Supreme Court’s abortion pill case could mean for CaliforniaThe high court is weighing a case that could rewrite the rules of care in more than two-thirds of U.S. abortions, limiting access to a popular drug even in states where it remains legal.
Lire la suite »
Will California restock its emergency reserve of abortion pills after today’s Supreme Court hearing?California bought and distributed a quarter of a million abortion pills, fearing a ban. The Supreme Court now seems hesitant to limit them.
Lire la suite »
Appeals court blocks Texas immigration law after Supreme Court actionLawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Lire la suite »
Ohio Supreme Court primary begins as Democrats try to flip court from Republican controlThe Democratic primary for one of Ohio's Supreme Court seats has begun. The state's Supreme Court has a 4-3 Republican majority, but Democrats hope to flip that in their favor.
Lire la suite »