The first-ever amicus brief cites harm to pregnant women and urges the Supreme Court to overturn Dobbs v. Jackson, which reversed Roe v. Wade.
framework is functionally unworkable, inherently standard-less and dangerous to pregnant people,” said Susan J. Frietsche of the Women’s Law Project, who filed the brief. “Abortion rights activists march to the White House to denounce the U.S. Supreme Court decision to end federal abortion rights protections on July 9, 2022.
“How much medical risk, physical pain and psychological torment should a pregnant person be forced to suffer before being allowed standard emergency abortion care?” asked Christine Castro, senior staff attorney at Women’s Law Project. “There is no definitive answer to that question under , who after receiving a lethal fetal diagnosis, was told by her doctor that she needed an abortion in order to preserve her health and future fertility.
Must a state law allow abortions when necessary to protect a woman’s life and health? And if so, exactly when? … Short of death, how much illness or injury can the State require her to accept, consistent with the Amendment’s protection of liberty and equality?
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
SOTU: Biden Goes Off Script to Scold Supreme Court Justices Over DobbsSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Lire la suite »
Fact Check: Biden Blames Supreme Court’s Dobbs Decision for Alabama IVF Case at SOTUSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Lire la suite »
Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer sounds off on Dobbs decision: 'Too many questions'Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer criticized the court's majority in the Dobbs decision and argued that there were 'too many questions' as a result.
Lire la suite »
Post-Dobbs Abortion Pill Surge Highlights Stakes of Looming Supreme Court CaseJulia Conley is a staff writer for Common Dreams.
Lire la suite »
Former Justice Stephen Breyer reflects on 'unfortunate' Supreme Court leak before Dobbs abortion rulingAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.
Lire la suite »
Stephen Breyer, retired Supreme Court justice: 'Possible' Dobbs abortion ruling could be overruledRetired Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer said Sunday it's 'possible' the high court could overrule its 2022 decision to do away with a national right to abortion.
Lire la suite »